LNG imports: Is coal ‘twice as bad’ as liquefied natural gas for emissions?
File photo. A gas rig off Taranaki.
Photo: Supplied
Spending hundreds of millions on building an liquefied natural gas import terminal will not reduce New Zealand's emissions compared with burning coal, says an energy expert.
Falling production from offshore gas fields, along with low hydro lake levels, have been blamed for burning more coal at the Huntly power station and increasing New Zealand's emissions.
But Sustainable Energy Professor Ralph Sims of Massey University says by the time gas is extracted, cooled, stored and shipped in the form of liquefied natural gas (LNG), any climate benefits over burning coal will disappear.
The government on Monday announced steps to address an energy crisis which has seen gas and electricity prices spike for many large commercial users and some c...









